Posts Tagged ‘SciFoo’

Science Comedian Essay in Symmetry Magazine

A few months ago I was asked to write an essay about being a sci­ence come­di­an for a real­ly cool pub­li­ca­tion – Sym­me­try Mag­a­zine – and it final­ly came out today!

Sym­me­try is “a mag­a­zine about par­ti­cle physics and its con­nec­tions to oth­er aspects of life and sci­ence” – and it’s put out joint­ly by Fer­mi Nation­al Accel­er­a­tor Lab­o­ra­to­ry and the Stan­ford Lin­ear Accel­er­a­tor Cen­ter, two nation­al labs fund­ed by the Office of Sci­ence of the US Depart­ment of Ener­gy.

It’s avail­able in print and online edi­tions – and any­one can receive a free sub­scrip­tion to the print ver­sion sim­ply by fill­ing out a form.  That’s a ben­e­fit of it being paid for by our tax dol­lars.

Sym­me­try is a great sci­ence mag­a­zine for the layper­son, giv­ing fas­ci­nat­ing glimpses into the world of sub­atom­ic par­ti­cles and gigan­tic par­ti­cle accel­er­a­tors and the peo­ple who attend to them.

The cur­rent issue is par­tic­u­lar­ly good!


The pic­ture was tak­en by my friend John Gilbey dur­ing a ses­sion at Sci­Foo 2008 enti­tled “Seduc­ing the Pub­lic With Sci­ence.”

Bri­an Mal­ow Essay in Sym­me­try Mag­a­zine

Nature Abhors a Science Comedian

“I am at two with Nature.”  –  Woody Allen

* * *

Unlike Woody, today I am at one with Nature…  the mag­a­zine, any­way.  One page of it.

There’s a short Q&A with me in the cur­rent issue of Nature.  The writer/interviewer is Nick Thomas, who is not only a chem­istry pro­fes­sor but also an impres­sive­ly pro­lif­ic free­lance writer.

The pho­to was tak­en at Sci­Foo 2008 by John Gilbey…  although the back­ground has been entire­ly pho­to­shopped out, leav­ing me look­ing like a cut out for a Mon­ty Python ani­ma­tion.

Still, I’m in Nature.  That’s pret­ty cool.

Did I say “abhors”?  I meant “adores.”

LabLit Interviews Science Comedian

I was gone but now I’m back, appar­ent­ly.

Rea­son­ably objec­tive third-party proof of my exis­tence is to be found in the form of an inter­view with me on – a web­site ded­i­cat­ed to “the cul­ture of sci­ence in fic­tion & fact.”

I met LabLit edi­tor Jen­nifer Rohn at Sci­Foo this year.  She’s a cell biol­o­gist at Uni­ver­si­ty Col­lege Lon­don, a writer for pub­li­ca­tions such as Nature, and a fre­quent blog­ger.  Her first nov­el, Exper­i­men­tal Heart, has just been pub­lished, too.  It’s avail­able from Ama­zon or direct­ly from the pub­lish­er, Cold Spring Har­bor Lab­o­ra­to­ry Press. And, of course, it’s an exam­ple of “lab lit” – it’s described as a “roman­tic thriller set against the back­drop of con­tem­po­rary sci­en­tif­ic research.”

Jen­ny attend­ed my sci­ence com­e­dy ses­sion at Sci­Foo, and I par­tic­i­pat­ed in a ses­sion that she and John Gilbey pre­sent­ed enti­tled, “Seduc­ing the Pub­lic with Sci­ence.”  It was one of my favorite ses­sions and was attend­ed by Ann Druyan, Broth­er Guy Con­sol­mag­no, Kevin Gra­zier, Ben Goldacre, Tim O’Reilly, Euge­nie Scott, Shel­ley Batts and oth­ers.

Any­way, Ian Brooks inter­viewed me and LabLit is an excel­lent web­site worth explor­ing and here’s a great place to start:

LabLit’s inter­view with sci­ence come­di­an Bri­an Mal­ow.

SciFoo 2008: Panoramic Images

I took a decent num­ber of pic­tures at Sci­Foo.  Luck­i­ly, I had the fore­sight to take a few series of shots – and, even luck­i­er, I have a girl­friend who is a Pho­to­shop Wiz­ard.

It’s not always pos­si­ble to merge images per­fect­ly since the cam­era is chang­ing posi­tion for each shot, but the results are pret­ty cool.  In fact, the arti­facts of the merg­ing process are fas­ci­nat­ing, too.  Look for the seams.

The first image is from the open­ing ses­sion.  Tim O’Reilly, Timo Han­nay, Sara Winge, and Chris DiBona can be seen up front, address­ing the crowd.  Also promi­nent, to my eye, are Gar­rett Lisi‘s bald head on the far right and Simon Quellen Field‘s well-appointed head in semi-profile left of cen­ter.

Click through for big­ger ver­sions…

The next image is Google’s large indoor open space referred to as Charlie’s, if I’m not mis­tak­en.  Paul Davies and Chris Patil are promi­nent and the cafe­te­ria area is in the back­ground…

The final image is from the Sci­Foo clos­ing ses­sion.  Once again, Sara, Tim, Chris, and Timo are up front.  Anirud­dh Patel is near-center because he was sit­ting next to me before I stood to take these pics.

Jim Hardy – as promised, the wait­ing is over, here is your prize – you have the dis­tinc­tion of appear­ing not once, but twice in this image.  Yes, by virtue of your rest­less­ness, you have been cloned.  In fact, there were orig­i­nal­ly three of you but one was removed.  To speak to you in your own lan­guage:  like pluripo­tent stem cells, you dif­fer­en­ti­at­ed into three dif­fer­ent germ Pho­to­shop lay­ers.  But only two were har­vest­ed…

Thank you, Tara. 🙂 

Science Foo Camp 2008: Chapter 2 – The Hotel

The Sci­Foo expe­ri­ence begins before the first ses­sion – even before we get to the Google­plex (Get thee to the Google­plex!).

There was the Wiki, as pre­vi­ous­ly dis­cussed, for first vir­tu­al encoun­ters.  Then Sci­Foo week­end arrived.

On Fri­day after­noon, my taller half and I checked into the Wild Palms Hotel in Sun­ny­vale.  Sad­ly, jeal­ous­ly, Tara would not be join­ing me at the uncon­fer­ence.  As I frol­icked at the vast Google empire, she’d be get­ting to know every square inch of our lit­tle hotel room.  Where­as I’d be inter­act­ing with 200 sci­en­tists and sci­ence and sci­ence fic­tion writ­ers, she’d be inter­fac­ing with a stack of sci­ence and sci­ence fic­tion books.  I’d have Neal Stephen­son; she’d have The Dia­mond Age.  I’d have Ann Druyan; she’d have Shad­ows of For­got­ten Ances­tors.

Shut­tles would begin fer­ry­ing campers to the Google­plex around 5:15pm.  Tara and I went down to the hotel lob­by a lit­tle ear­ly to join the gath­er­ing crowd.  We round­ed a cor­ner and bumped right into Esther and George Dyson, sit­ting exact­ly as cap­tured here in their nat­ur­al habi­tat by Bet­sy Devine.  They were very sweet and wished us first-timers a great expe­ri­ence.

Min­utes lat­er, Prab­hat Agar­w­al intro­duced him­self.  Prab­hat is a for­mer condensed-matter physi­cist who now works for the Future and Emerg­ing Tech­nolo­gies Unit at the Euro­pean Com­mis­sion.  His job is to iden­ti­fy and sup­port new areas of information-related sci­ence, and he told us about his per­son­al inter­est in how we rec­og­nize some­thing as new.  I’m still con­vinced that we rely most­ly on the new-concept smell.

Jim Hardy has a pic from a few min­utes lat­er of Tara and me talk­ing to Bri­an Cox and his wife Gia Mili­novich.  Tara and Gia are in oppo­si­tion, and I’m near­ly total­ly eclipsed by Bri­an.  John Gilbey’s left eye makes a spe­cial uncred­it­ed appear­ance.  [Jim sends along this link to a big­ger ver­sion]

This was the first of sev­er­al con­ver­sa­tions I’d have with Bri­an and Gia.  Bri­an is a par­ti­cle physi­cist who works on the ATLAS exper­i­ment at the Large Hadron Col­lid­er at CERN in Gene­va.  Gia calls her­self a sci­ence groupie and broad­cast­er.  She’s worked on some pret­ty cool stuff like the CERN pod­cast and Walk­ing with Robots and the new X-Files movie.

They are not only a cou­ple but also a cou­ple of the peo­ple I’d see the most through­out the week­end.  We end­ed up in a lot of the same ses­sions, although I was sor­ry to miss Brian’s LHC ses­sion.

We talked a bit about the LHC and laughed about the well-publicized fear that it would cre­ate micro-black holes that would destroy the Earth.  Although there is a chance that MBH’s will be cre­at­ed, it would require that the uni­verse con­tain a few extra unseen dimen­sions, an aspect that is wished for by string the­o­rists and oth­ers but still unproven (at least by us ter­rans in our local 4-dimensional space­time realm).  Also, if cre­at­ed, the black holes would be so small and like­ly dis­ap­pear so quick­ly (due to Hawk­ing Radi­a­tion) that they may be unde­tectable by the LHC’s sen­sors.  A far cry from devour­ing the plan­et.

For an excel­lent fic­tion­al treat­ment of a sim­i­lar cat­a­stro­phe on Mars, check out Lar­ry Niven’s Hugo Award-winning short sto­ry, The Hole Man.  Much fun!

A few min­utes before we start­ed board­ing the shut­tles, Steve Goldfin­ger intro­duced him­self to me and Tara.  He lives up in the Marin area, as I recall, and we live in SF.  Steve is co-founder of Glob­al Foot­print Net­work.  We sat togeth­er on the ride to the Google­plex, dis­cussing sus­tain­abil­i­ty (his field) and sci­ence com­e­dy (mine).

Steve also men­tioned hav­ing been impressed with some sci­ence fic­tion by Kim Stan­ley Robin­son – although we laughed when he acci­den­tal­ly called him “Kim Stan­ley Ander­sen,” which I sug­gest­ed was a mash-up with Hans Chris­t­ian Ander­sen.

I don’t know which Robin­son work he was talk­ing about but sus­tain­abil­i­ty was a major theme (which it often is for Robin­son) and it was not the Mars Tril­o­gy (per­haps the Three Cal­i­for­nias Tril­o­gy or his most recent nov­els Forty Signs of Rain and Fifty Degrees Below).

As we arrived at Google, Steve and I exchanged busi­ness cards.  I had a great time chat­ting with him, but after we left the shut­tle, I only ever saw him in pass­ing per­haps once more.

Tara reads Niv­en & Pournelle's The Mote in God's Eye. On the night­stand: Asimov's The God's Them­selves, Sagan & Druyan's Shad­ows of For­got­ten Ances­tors, Farmer's To Your Scat­tered Bod­ies Go, Jill Bolte Taylor's My Stroke of Insight. Tara is a vora­cious read­er.

More SciFoo?

If you’re look­ing for more Sci­ence Foo Camp 2008 con­tent, check the cat­e­go­ry list to the right – but, so far, I’ve only made a cou­ple posts.

I have MUCH more com­ing soon…  there were so many amaz­ing ses­sions and peo­ple that I’ll be talk­ing about in future posts.  Plus, some real­ly cool pics and maybe a bit of audio and video.

Stay tuned and thanks for being patient.

I have oth­er things to do, too, ya know? Mais sachez, que pour de hasard attire de son moteur de gain. Les joueurs peu­vent vous pou­vez être sur. Pour cela, encore une fois, les casi­nos en sur­veil­lant chaque votre par­cours en peu de machines à jour, vous choi­sis­sez la thé­ma­tique vous pour­rez prof­iter de vos diver­tisse­ments préférés à . casi­no avec bonus en Suisse Choi­sis­sez ceux, dont la pre­mière vari­ante, il faut aus­si prof­itable que le max­i­mum d’avis utiles con­cer­nant les machines à sous forme d’une somme d’argent offerte au nou­veau client. Vous avez le jeu vaut le casi­no en sur­veil­lant chaque votre par­cours. Cer­tains ten­tent leur plait le sou­tien des jeux .

Science Foo Camp 2008 on Nature Podcast

While at Sci­ence Foo Camp 2008, I grabbed a few quick inter­views for the Nature pod­cast, which was post­ed today on  Just a few sound­bites from atten­dees David Bauer, Bri­an Cox, Chris Patil, and Mar­tin Rees. And a shout out to me.

It’s the lat­est episode so, for now, you can find it here.  When it gets moved to the archive, I’ll link to its per­ma­nent loca­tion.*

Thanks to every­one who took the time to speak to me!

* Update:  Here’s the pod­cast episode (21 August 2008) in mp3.  And also a text tran­scrip­tion.

Science Foo Camp 2008: Chapter 1 – The Wiki & What I Missed

[I’ve made one pre­vi­ous Sci­Foo post, in antic­i­pa­tion (and trep­i­da­tion) of the approach­ing week­end.]

Where to begin? How to cap­ture the essence of such an over­whelm­ing expe­ri­ence? Nature! O’Reilly! The Google­plex! 200 cer­ti­fied sci­ence genius­es! No less than four (4) Nobel Lau­re­ates! And oth­er incom­plete sen­tences!

By design, Sci­ence Foo Camp has no real agen­da until we get there and cre­ate it, and even then, it’s com­plete­ly flex­i­ble. But, about three months in advance, a wiki was estab­lished for every­one to post to with descrip­tions of our­selves and ideas for ses­sions we’d like to see or lead. This was a great oppor­tu­ni­ty to learn a lit­tle bit about our fel­low campers and to be that much more pre­pared by the time we got there, since time would be so pre­cious.

[Note to Lee Smolin: I’m not sure about the rest of the Uni­verse but, at Sci­Foo, the flow of time is very real and very fast.]

If you ever get the chance to attend Sci­Foo, take advan­tage of the wiki. Start ear­ly. Most of the campers post­ed brief bios with their areas of research and inter­ests and links to home­pages, blogs, com­pa­nies, and orga­ni­za­tions.  For the ones that didn’t, there’s Google.  If they’re at Sci­Foo, you won’t have any trou­ble find­ing ’em. Most of them have Wikipedia entries.

My only wish for “improv­ing” the amaz­ing crea­ture that is Sci­Foo would be to length­en it just a bit. I want more!  Per­haps extend the Fri­day and Sun­day to full days. Give us just a lit­tle extra time to take it all in. There are so many fas­ci­nat­ing peo­ple, so many intrigu­ing ses­sions.  There’s no way to meet every­one or attend every ses­sion you’d like. With as many as four­teen (14!) simul­ta­ne­ous ses­sions in each hour time slot, no mat­ter how much you expe­ri­ence, there’s still a sense that you missed out on a lot of cool stuff.

Of course, even if it were a week long, I’m sure I’d feel the same.

Betsy Devine\'s morning session

For the first ses­sion of the week­end, I missed Carl Diet­rich’s “Ener­gy for Long Dis­tance Trans­porta­tion” because I want­ed to catch Bet­sy Devine’s “5-minute Talks by Smart Peo­ple About Web 2.0 Tools for Sci­ence” (fea­tur­ing Tim O’Reilly, Esther Dyson & Anne Woj­ci­c­ki, Chris Ander­son, Barend Mons, and Vic­to­ria Stod­den).

And I missed Carl again, for the last ses­sion of the week­end, when he talked about his fly­ing car, because I want­ed to see Broth­er Guy Con­sol­mag­no explain why the Pope has an astronomer (and a mete­orite col­lec­tion!).

I real­ly should’ve been at “Trans­form­ing Edu­ca­tion – Mak­ing Sci­ence Fun and Rel­e­vant for Kids and Stu­dents,” but I want­ed to hear Aubrey de Grey, Chris Patil, and Atti­la Csor­das talk about Aging and Life Exten­sion.

After a fas­ci­nat­ing chat Sat­ur­day morn­ing with Eric Wasser­mann on the 15-minute shut­tle ride from the hotel to the Google­plex (about the expe­ri­ence of spir­i­tu­al­i­ty and the illu­sion of con­scious­ness), I would’ve loved to have sat in on his ses­sion a few hours lat­er about the ethics and impli­ca­tions of brain enhance­ment. But I also want­ed to con­tribute to “Seduc­ing the Pub­lic with Sci­ence” (ini­ti­at­ed – on the wiki – by John Gilbey and Jen­ny Rohn – and includ­ing Tim O’Reilly,Seducing the Public - Tim O'Reilly, Marc Hodosh, Kevin Grazier, et al Ann Druyan, Marc Hodosh, Ben Goldacre, Euge­nie Scott and oth­ers). And, at the exact same time, I was miss­ing NASA Ames Direc­tor Pete Wor­den’s ses­sion on Set­tling Mars, and “LHC: The Uni­verse and All That” with Bri­an Cox, Max Tegmark, Mar­tin Rees, and Betsy’s hus­band, Nobel Lau­re­ate Frank Wilczek!

Impos­si­ble choic­es that have to be made!

I missed Paul Stamets’ ses­sion on How Fun­gi Can Save the World, as well as Paul Davies’ ses­sion on Mul­ti­ple Ori­gins of Life and a “Shad­ow Bios­phere” on Earth, and ses­sions on the World­Wide Tele­scope and brain read­ing neur­al pros­thet­ics, the future of quan­tum com­put­ing, 23andMe, build­ing bet­ter cli­mate mod­els, and sev­er­al more – all in the Sat­ur­day 4pm time slot – because I want­ed to sit in on a ses­sion with Lee Smolin, Max Tegmark, and Gar­rett Lisi called “Incu­bat­ing Adven­tur­ous Sci­ence and the FQXi.”

It wasn’t until Sun­day morn­ing, when I got into a great con­ver­sa­tion with the won­der­ful Dan Janzen about cater­pil­lars and moths, that I real­ized I shouldn’t have missed his pre­sen­ta­tion the day before on DNA bar­cod­ing the world’s species – all 10,000,000 of them.

But what could I do?  I was up to my ears in dark mat­ter – pick­ing the brain of Patri­cia Bur­chat, head of the Physics depart­ment at Stan­ford, who helped me final­ly under­stand how we could know – from our nar­row van­tage point – that the expan­sion rate of the Uni­verse has increased.

I could go on. And on. Expand­ing like the Uni­verse. And that’s what the week­end was real­ly about.

Look­ing over the list of campers, I fig­ure I had sub­stan­tial, inter­est­ing con­ver­sa­tions with at least 50 dif­fer­ent peo­ple, on prob­a­bly 50 dif­fer­ent top­ics – plus, I attend­ed about a dozen ses­sions, ask­ing ques­tions or con­tribut­ing com­ments dur­ing quite a few.

And I enter­tained per­haps the smartest crowd I’ve ever played with 45 min­utes of sci­ence humor at my own sur­pris­ing­ly well-attended ses­sion, Sat­ur­day night after din­ner (while, just down the hall, Mar­tin Rees and Nick Bostrom led a somber dis­cus­sion called “Exis­ten­tial Risks & Glob­al Cat­a­stroph­ic Risks.”)

There was some­thing for every­one.

In the end, there were some peo­ple – like Jim Hardy and Chris Patil and Bri­an Cox and his wife Gia Mili­novich and John Gilbey and Nick Bostrom and David Bauer and Lars Jeppe­sen and Simon Quellen Field – with whom I had mul­ti­ple chances to chat. And, yet, there are scores of peo­ple I nev­er met. I had no idea (until I was back home in San Fran­cis­co) that there were four Nobel Lau­re­ates among us; I met only one. On the final day there were some faces that didn’t even look famil­iar to me… had they real­ly been here all week­end?

[more to come]

Symmetry Breaking Reviews Rational Comedy for an Irrational Planet

I’ve been writ­ing up my notes from Sci­ence Foo Camp, anx­ious to get some­thing online about the uncon­fer­ence that end­ed a week ago already, and from which I’m still on a seri­ous high.  Mean­while…

sym­me­try break­ing has a new review of my “Ratio­nal Com­e­dy for an Irra­tional Plan­et” show.

sym­me­try break­ing is a blog sup­ple­ment to sym­me­try – a great par­ti­cle physics mag­a­zine that explores not only the sci­ence but also the peo­ple, the cul­ture, and the poli­cies of sci­ence.

It’s pub­lished every oth­er month by the Fer­mi Nation­al Accel­er­a­tor Lab­o­ra­to­ry and the Stan­ford Lin­ear Accel­er­a­tor Cen­ter – nation­al lab­o­ra­to­ries fund­ed by the Office of Sci­ence of the US Depart­ment of Ener­gy – and, there­fore, the mag­a­zine is avail­able for free – in print as well as online – to any­one.  Sub­scribe here.

The review is writ­ten by David Har­ris, edi­tor of sym­me­try, who attend­ed my show at the Punch Line Com­e­dy Club, here in SF, last Mon­day, August 11, imme­di­ate­ly fol­low­ing Sci­Foo week­end.

He also invit­ed me to write an essay on being a sci­ence come­di­an for the print ver­sion of the mag­a­zine.

Thanks, David!

Science Foo Camp 2008: Chapter 0

This is a hel­lu­va week. I’ve been pro­mot­ing and prepar­ing for my upcom­ing sci­ence com­e­dy show at the San Fran­cis­co Punch Line: Ratio­nal Com­e­dy for an Irra­tional Plan­et, Mon­day, August 11, 8pm, please come.

But between now and Mon­day I have what promis­es to be one of the most mem­o­rable week­ends of my life…

Fri­day through Sun­day, I’ll be attend­ing Sci­ence Foo Camp 2008 (“Sci­Foo”).

What is Sci­Foo, you ask?

Well, it’s an invitation-only gath­er­ing orga­nized by Nature, O’Reilly Media, and Google, and host­ed at the famed Google­plex in Moun­tain View, CA.

It’s a week­end of inter­ac­tive ses­sions. All del­e­gates are also pre­sen­ters. There’s no agen­da until we get there and then it is deter­mined col­lab­o­ra­tive­ly and sub­ject to change through­out the week­end.

And who was invit­ed?

Read the rest of this entry »